ADF is a religious organization whose goal is to protect and
defend religious freedom. The organization believes that this IRS tax code is
unconstitutional because it violates the First Amendment by prohibiting pastors
and other religious organizations from exercising their right to free speech. The
organization will hold a “Pulpit Freedom Sunday” on October 7, 2012 where
pastors will preach sermons that discuss the current political candidates and then
make specific recommendations. The sermons will also be recorded and sent to
the IRS in order to incite action by the IRS.
However, some pastors have reported that in the past, the
IRS simply sent a letter warning of the violation but closes the case prior to
being taken to court. In order for the group to challenge the constitutionality
of the amendment, the IRS must first apply the code to a particular church or
pastor. ADF is hoping that the IRS will respond by taking action against the
bold religious leaders so that it may challenge this amendment in court.
It would be wise for these pastors to evaluate whether the
action they are undertaking is worth the risk of losing their organization's tax exemption status. I
envision that one argument that will be presented in court on behalf of the
IRS is that the granting of tax exemption to charitable organizations is not a “right”
it is a “privilege.” As such, the IRS has the right to restrict certain
actions, even if it requires giving up a constitutional right. For example,
under the US Constitution, citizens have the right to bear arms. With that
right to bear arms, there are restrictions such as age, licensing requirements,
criminal background check, etc. So for the sake of the organizations that they
represent, the pastors involved should seriously evaluate whether participating
in Pulpit Freedom Sunday is worth the risk of losing the organization’s
exemption status.
Do you think that the action being taken by the pastors is worth the risk?
ReplyDelete