The Republican plan proposed by Senator Orrin G. Hatch of
Utah, proposes to end the tax cuts established by the Bush Administration. The
Republican plan would result in an expiration of tax breaks for 13 million low
income taxpayers, while extending tax cuts to approximately 2.7 million of the
upper class taxpayers. It would also result in a reduction of refunds for
approximately thirteen million families, while some would incur an increase in
taxation.
The Democratic plan favors extending the tax cuts
established by the Bush Administration to 2013 as it would benefit middle class
families. Under the Democratic plan, earnings of over $250,000 would be taxed
at about 36 percent and 39.6 percent instead of the current 33 percent and 35
percent established by the Bush Administration. The estate tax rate would also
be increased to 55 percent on inheritances over $1 million for individual taxpayers
and $2 million for married taxpayers, instead of the 35 percent currently paid
by estates valuing over $5 million for individual taxpayers, and $10 million
for married taxpayers.
The Democratic plan would raise approximately $82 billion
more in taxes in 2013 than the Republican plan. However, according to Congress’s
Joint Committee on Taxation, a permanent extension of all tax cuts established
by the Bush Administration would reduce taxes for households earning more than
$1 million annually by approximately $74,500 in 2013, while the Democratic
proposal would reduce taxes for those same households by approximately $7,000.
Republicans support ending the tax cuts established by the
Bush Administration because it favors the working poor who currently receive
approximately $3 in government benefits for every $1 they earn, while the
middle 20 percent receives more in government refunds that they actually paid
in taxes. Republicans also argue that the working poor have already received
increases in government aids such as food stamps and unemployment benefits. As
a result, Republicans argue that it makes sense to let this tax cut lapse, as
it was not meant to be permanent but was meant to be temporary assistance to
help boost the economy.
Which plan would you choose?